Read + Write + Report
Home | Start a blog | About Orble | FAQ | Blogs | Writers | My Orble | Login

Movie Train - FILM REVIEWS by Morgan Bell

 
Fresh critical film reviews by young Australian journalist Morgan Bell. A bight-sized opinionated analysis of popular movies and indie/art-house feature films. Explores plot, themes, characters, performances, soundtracks and film technique. Morgan Bell assesses movies in the context of what makes a successful cinema or DVD experience.

Movie Train - August 2008

REVIEW: The Dark Knight

August 24th 2008 19:24
Directed: Christopher Nolan (Memento, Insomnia, Batman Begins),

Written: Christopher Nolan (Memento, Batman Begins), Johnathan Nolan (Memento), David S Goyer (Blade, Batman Begins, Jumper) - based on the comic by Bob Kane

Starring: Christian bale (American Psycho, 3:10 To Yuma, Rescue Dawn), Heath Ledger (Brokeback Mountain, A Knights Tale, Candy), Aaron Eckhart (Erin Brokovich, Thank You For Smoking, No Reservations), Gary Oldman (The Scarlet Letter, The Fifth Element), Michael Caine (Children Of Men, The Weather Man)

I know that Batman is in this film but by the end I couldnt recall one memorable thing he said or did - this film is a showcase for The Joker and i was completely mesmerised every time he appeared on screen.

It was a bitter-sweet feeling to watch Heath Ledger so fully emmerce himself in the role of The Joker, knowing that he will never be able to reprise this defining character that he so masterfully etched out. I had to stop myself from falling completely in love with The Joker because i knew i would never see him again. It is impossible to separate Ledger's performance from his death as it alters the way you relate to The Joker and forces you to keep him at arms length. If Ledger were alive today The Dark Knight would have been a completely different experience, you could freely emmerce yourself in The Joker's passion and complexity without inhibition, knowing there would be more to enjoy later.

Before i get all misty eyed lamenting over Heath Ledger's death (again) i will paraphrase Oscar Wilde and say that sometimes a tragedy can contain artistic elements, beauty and style that appeals to our sense of dramatic effect and enthalls us. Heath Ledgers real life tragedy unintentionally generates a guarded feeling towards his portrayal of The Joker, and within this context the character gains an impenetrable layer that completes the role so perfectly. I was enthalled by the poetic justice. Not scared, or saddened - just enthralled.





The Joker is a sort of anti-hero forcing the people of Gotham to re-evaluate whether Batman should have absolute power over crime and punishment in the city. The Joker sets up a series of eloborate tests for Batman, the police force, the politicians, the criminals, and the general public to shine a light on all that is hidden and to prompt people to question for themselves and find common ground with their enemies. The Joker is a ruthless and manipulative killer, a sociopath devoid of empathy, and above all completely fearless.

Throughout the film The Joker snuffles and licks his lips like the car-chasing dog he likens himself to. But we see glimpses of his bare wrists and forearms to remind us that he is mere man with human skin. When runs his fingers through his grungy hair we are confronted by his dark black eyes - empty, hollow, darting, deranged - perhaps only the shell of a man?


"Do I really look like a guy with a plan? You know what I am? I'm a dog chasing cars. I wouldn't know what to do with one if I caught it! You know, I just, do things. The mob has plans, the cops have plans, Gordon's got plans. You know, they're schemers. Schemers trying to control their worlds. I'm not a schemer. I try to show the schemers how, pathetic, their attempts to control things really are."

The Joker, The Dark Knight (2008)


Heath Ledger as The Joker in The Dark Knight



The Dark Knight is brilliantly written and constructed, the plot is very sophisticated (a caper within a caper within a caper) and the political and moral themes are woven seamlessly into the character conflicts. Great dialogue. Great character development. This film is an instant classic.

Thankyou Heath . . . this really is the feather is your cap . . . rest in peace xx




135
Vote
   


REVIEW: Mamma Mia!

August 23rd 2008 07:35
Directed: Phyllida Lloyd

Written: Catherine Johnson

Starring: Maryl Streep, Pierce Brosnan, Colin Firth, Stellan Skarsgård, Julie Walters, Christine Baranski, Amanda Seyfried, Dominic Cooper

This film makes you want to take a summer holiday off the coast of Greece and sing your way around the islands . . . possibly with Pierce Brosnan . . . definately with a cocktail and the breeze in your hair!

Amanda Seyfried and Meryl Streep in Mamma Mia!


The key to Mamma Mia is location, location, location. The idyllic paradise location eats up the screen and washes you with a sense of tranquility. Mamma Mia was filmed on a series of small Greek islands, including Skopelos and Skiathos, and the seaside hamlet of Damouchari in the Pelion area of Greece. The films main location site was Kastani bay, at Skopelos. Apparently the producers built a beach bar and jetty along the tiny west-coast bay, but removed them both when they left.

Skopelos


The basic story is that a young woman, Sophie (Seyfried) is due to wed her boyfirend Sky (Cooper) and uses the event as an opportunity to figure out who her father is. Around the time of her conception her mother Donna (Streep) was seeing three different men, Sam (Brosnan), Harry (Firth) and Bill (Skarsgård). Sophie invites all three men to the wedding without telling her mother or telling the men why they are there. Calamity and singing ensues!

This film is a "jukebox musical" with singing of the pop hits of ABBA solidly throughout. It is an adaptation of the stage musical of the same name and translates to being a funny and warm comedy on the screen. There is a huge cast and supporting chorus which gives a festival feel. Streep and Brosnan are delightful together and bring a self-awareness to the singing. The storyline has a classical symmetry to it whereby all of the plot points raised are tied off neatly by the end and all the characters are paired up happily.




Mamma Mia contains the following ABBA songs:

"I Have a Dream"
"Honey, Honey"
"Money, Money, Money"
"Mamma Mia"
"Chiquitita"
"Dancing Queen"
"Our Last Summer"
"Lay All Your Love on Me"
"Super Trouper"
"Gimme! Gimme! Gimme!"
"The Name of the Game"
"Voulez-Vous"
"SOS"
"Does Your Mother Know"
"Slipping Through My Fingers"
"The Winner Takes It All"
"I Do, I Do, I Do, I Do, I Do"
"When All is Said and Done"
"Take a Chance on Me"
"Mamma Mia" (Reprise)
"I Have a Dream"
"Dancing Queen" (end credits)
"Waterloo" (end credits)
"Thank You for the Music" (end credits)

99
Vote
   


REVIEW: The Strangers

August 21st 2008 06:03
Directed & Written: Bryan Bertino (debut)

Starring: Liv Tyler (Reign Over Me, One Night At McCools, Inventing The Abbotts), Scott Speedman (Duets, The 24th Day, TVs "Felicity"), Glenn Howerton (TVs "Its Always Sunny In Philadelphia")

A young couple staying in an isolated vacation home are terrorized by three unknown assailants.

This is a very short (only running 85 min) one dimensional horror film which will hold you in suspense and make you jump . . . but once you leave the cinema you will laugh for hours about how stupid the premise was!

I did jump, i jumped many times . . . I held my fingers to my mouth and tensed my body in anticipation . . . the director set out to scare the audience and he did so very effectively - he achieved his brief . . . Liv Tyler's acting is superb creating genuine fear and terror, the film is practically a one man show so her performance was critical and she pulled it off beatifully!

However, I have to point out why this is not a fantastic movie on the whole:

*spoilers below*

Liv Tyler in The Strangers





*SPOILER ALERT*

I wondered if this film was financed by some kind of home security company or someone with a vested interest in instilling irrational fear into people. I wondered this due to the complete lack of motive that "the strangers" had for their attack. For the bulk of the film you are waiting to see why they have broken in but the only explanation that is given is that it is completely random, they are not robbing the home, they did not know the victims, they toy with the victims for a huge amount of time for no real reason other than to draw out the "cat and mouse" style thrills and spills, they have never killed before, they are not in it to sexually assault or to hold hostage for money. Why? Basically they selected Kristen (Tyler) and James (Speedman) simply because they were home and opened the door. A throw-away line at the end tells us they think it will be easier next time, perhaps it is practise for the sequels?

The attackers, apart from having scary masks, are not really that scary. They are two of the smallest women ive ever seen and a slow-moving guy with some kind of an asthma problem that causes a wheezy sound when he breaths. They come to the property completly unarmed with only the element of surprise on their side and the weapons they find during their cat and mouse game. Liv Tyler has the height of an amazon, James has a shotgun, they have a car and three phones, yet somehow they can not gain control of the situation of over-power these masked pesky pipsqueaks?

The sequence where their friend Mike (Howerton) arrives at the property and continues advancing into the danger of the situation is just ridiculous. If someone smashed your windscreen when you pulled up and you looked down the drive and saw your best friends car on fire, all the windows of the house smashed in and an unknown vehicle in the drive would you really enter? Once inside theres signs of calamity and destruction everywhere yet you just keep advancing? please . . .

And finally, was there any point in the first half hour of character building for Kristen and James? The depth with which their relationship was scrutinised seemed completely redundant once it was revealed that the crime was random. Flashbacks to the dinner table earlier in the evening and Kristen explaining she wants to keep her frilly dress on because it makes her feel pretty . . . seriously . . . was it just padding to draw out the film to be feature length? It was completely irrelevant because it didnt tie into anything!



89
Vote
   


More Posts
1 Posts
1 Posts
1 Posts
84 Posts dating from August 2007
Email Subscription
Receive e-mail notifications of new posts on this blog:

Morgan Bell's Blogs

7769 Vote(s)
649 Comment(s)
69 Post(s)
4859 Vote(s)
81 Comment(s)
62 Post(s)
33887 Vote(s)
4961 Comment(s)
245 Post(s)
12822 Vote(s)
378 Comment(s)
160 Post(s)
Moderated by Morgan Bell
Copyright © 2006 2007 2008 On Topic Media PTY LTD. All Rights Reserved. Design by Vimu.com.
On Topic Media ZPages: Sydney |  Melbourne |  Brisbane |  London |  Birmingham |  Leeds     [ Advertise ] [ Contact Us ] [ Privacy Policy ]